Madrid Protocol Individual Fees
Overview : This comprehensive blog on Madrid System Schedule fees offers a detailed compilation of trademark registration fees charged by individual Designated Parties who are members of the Madrid Protocol. Madrid Protocol, along with the Madrid Agreement, governs the course of International Trademark Registration worldwide. Navigating through this blog will help you access crucial information regarding the financial aspects of this process so that you can make informed decisions while acquiring global trademark protection for your brand.
The Madrid System, governed by the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO), stands as an international framework facilitating the streamlined registration of trademarks across multiple jurisdictions. This powerful system empowers businesses and individuals to protect their brands globally with efficiency and ease. In this context, Madrid Protocol trademark filing fees refer to the structured fee framework associated with international trademark registration. While Schedule Madrid Protocol Fees include the fees for various activities, the fees we have discussed in the table below mentions only the amount charged by individual designated parties. Note that, designated parties enjoy complete discretion over deciding the fees for Trademark Registration under Madrid System.
Madrid System Schedule Fees by Individual Designated Parties
Designated Parties | Madrid Individual Fees | Collective / Certification Marks |
---|---|---|
African Intellectual Property Organization (OAPI) | 639131 | 2105 |
Armenia | 22122 | |
Australia | 263 | |
Bahrain | 1710 | |
Belarus | 60050 | 23817 |
Benelux | 16717 | |
Bonaire, Saint Eustatius & Saba | 19520 | 27920 |
Bulgaria | 32721 | 59554 |
China | 249125 | 747374 |
Colombia | 281140 | 374187 |
Cuba | 27491 (1st Part) 82 (2nd Part) | 32091 |
Curaçao | 33635 | 66768 |
Denmark | 33084 | 20347 |
Estonia | 15147 | |
European Union | 89755 164 (For Each Additional Class) | 153155 164 (For Each Additional Class) |
Finland | 22584 | 30484 |
Gambia | 97 | 577105 |
Georgia | 314115 | |
Ghana | 379 | |
Greece | 11521 | |
Iceland | 27058 | |
India | 62 | 156 |
Ireland | 25773 | 318 |
Israel | 407306 | |
Italy | 9532 | |
Japan | 10882 (1st Part) 269 (2nd Part) | 12111211 |
Kenya | 312223 | |
Kyrgyzstan | 340160 | |
Lao People’s Democratic Republic | 141101 | |
Mexico | 149 | |
New Zealand | 93 | |
Norway | 27878 | |
Oman | 484484 | |
Philippines | 95 | 30452 |
Republic of Korea | 233 | |
Republic of Moldova | 25252 | |
San Marino | 15541 | 27972 |
Singapore | 272 | 59361 |
Sint Maarten (Dutch part) | 29831 | |
Sweden | 260102 | 1543154 |
Switzerland | 45050 | |
Syrian Arab Republic | 193 | |
Tajikistan | 43834 | |
Tunisia | 13117 | |
Turkey | 17835 | |
Turkmenistan | 15176 | |
Ukraine | 42986 | |
United Kingdom | 22763 | |
United States of America | 301301 | |
Vietnam | 10184 | |
Zimbabwe | 9758 |
Conclusion
Our exploration of the Madrid System Schedule Fees in this blog unveils the critical financial aspect of international trademark registration. By delving into the nuances of Madrid fee structures for individual Designated Parties, we've provided a valuable resource for brand owners and trademark professionals across the world. As the intricate landscape of intellectual property continues to evolve, understanding and navigating the Madrid System Schedule Fees becomes paramount for informed decision-making, especially regarding global brand protection.