Company Name Approval Rules, Regulations, and the Process in India

This article aims to provide a comprehensive guide on the rules, regulations, and processes for company name approval in India. It highlights the key legal provisions of the Companies Act 2013 and its corresponding rules, along with additional legal considerations. The article suggests that entrepreneurs and business owners must consider uniqueness, legality, and branding when choosing a company name. Conducting a thorough trademark search and checking past registrations is crucial to preventing conflicts. After reading this article, the readers will gain knowledge about the legal framework governing company name approval in India and understand the importance of choosing a valid company name.
Selecting a powerful company name in India is not only a branding tactic, it’s also a legal requirement. A suitable name not only provides your business with a memorable identity but also satisfies the legal criteria for name approval and reservation. This article is a complete guide for entrepreneurs and business owners who are dealing with the intricacies of naming their companies in India.

Key Considerations for Choosing a Company Name

  1. Uniqueness: In India, your company name should not “too closely resemble” existing names. Violating this rule can lead to legal complications. Searching for existing companies and trademarks is crucial to ensure your chosen name is unique. Be aware of government-restricted words and names that cannot be used without special permissions.
  2. Legality: Your company name must not include prohibited words and phrases that could mislead or offend. Using the location of your registered office in the name might be advisable. Also, consider industry-specific restrictions to avoid legal pitfalls.
  3. Branding: Choose a name that is memorable, relevant to your business, and appealing to your target audience. Additionally, checking the availability of the domain name is crucial for your online presence.

Legal Provisions for Company Name Approval in India

Selecting a valid company name is crucial for establishing a distinct identity and securing legal protection. Understanding the legal framework governing company name approval in India is essential for avoiding pitfalls and ensuring a smooth incorporation process. This note details the key provisions of the Companies Act 2013 and its corresponding rules, along with additional legal considerations.

Key Legal Provisions

1. Companies Act, 2013

Section 4 of the Companies Act outlines the principles for selecting a company name in India. It specifies that names should be different from existing companies or LLPs, including minor variations or changes in legal status. The section also prohibits names that violate laws related to obscenity, offensiveness, or impersonating government entities. Additionally, it grants the Central Government the discretion to deem names undesirable, particularly those implying government patronage or misleading the public. This legal framework ensures that company names are distinctive, appropriate, and not misleading to stakeholders. The following are not allowed under section 4
  1. Names that are identical or deceptively similar to those of existing Indian companies or LLPs cannot be used, even if they have minor variations, grammatical changes, or different legal statuses (e.g., Pvt. Ltd. vs. Ltd.).
  2. Names that may violate other laws, including obscenity, offensiveness, or impersonation of government entities, are not allowed.
  3. Names that are undesirable in the opinion of the Central Government typically cover names implying government patronage or misleading the public.

2. Emblems and Names

Section 18(2) pertains to the Emblems and Names (Prevention of Improper Use) Act, 1950. This section is crucial as it restricts companies from using names that resemble or imitate protected emblems, titles, or symbols. For example, a company cannot use national symbols or government-associated emblems in its name as it may imply an unauthorised association or endorsement by the government. This ensures that the dignity and significance of national emblems and titles are preserved and not commercially exploited or misrepresented.

3. Companies Incorporation Rules, 2014:

Rule 8 of the Companies Incorporation Rules, 2014, expands on the principles of naming a company. It defines conditions under which names are considered identical, including minor spelling changes and grammatical differences. It also lists specific types of undesirable names, such as those with obscene language, violating trademarks, or implying government connections. Additionally, this rule specifies certain words like “Board,” “President,” or “National” that require prior government approval before being included in a company name, reflecting the need for regulatory compliance in the naming process.
  1. Identical Names: Rule 8 of the Companies Incorporation Rules, 2014, provides a detailed framework for determining if a company name is identical to another. It includes criteria such as minor spelling variations, grammatical differences, and the use of definite or indefinite articles. This rule helps ensure that new company names are sufficiently distinct from existing ones, preventing confusion and maintaining individual corporate identities. For a detailed understanding of these guidelines, referring directly to Rule 8 of the Companies Incorporation Rules is recommended.
  2. Undesirable Names: Under Rule 8 of the Companies Incorporation Rules, 2014, specific categories of names are deemed undesirable for company registration. These include names containing obscene language, those that may infringe upon trademarks, names that closely resemble well-known organisations and names that suggest or imply a connection with the government or its agencies. The objective of this rule is to prevent the use of company names that could mislead, offend, or cause confusion among the public or stakeholders.
  3. Government Approval: Rule 8 of the Companies Incorporation Rules, 2014, specifies that certain words in a company name require prior approval from the Central Government. These include terms like “Board,” “President,” “National,” and other words that might imply an association with government bodies. This requirement ensures that the use of such words in company names does not mislead the public into thinking there is an official government connection or endorsement when there is none.

4. Trademark Act, 1999

It’s important for companies to ensure that their chosen name does not violate existing registered trademarks, even if the trademark is not currently in use by another company. A thorough trademark search is critical to avoid legal complications related to trademark infringement. Under the Trademark Act of 1999, a company name cannot infringe upon registered trademarks. To ensure the chosen name is legally compliant and does not violate the intellectual property rights of others, conducting a comprehensive trademark search is a crucial step in the company naming process.

5. Company Registration History

When you are registering a company, it is crucial to take into account the history of company registrations. You need to keep in mind that the names of companies that have been dissolved in the past two years might still be unavailable for new registrations. The reason for this is to avoid any conflicts or confusion with recently dissolved entities. Hence, it is essential to check past registrations as a crucial step in the company naming process.

When you are deciding on a name for your company, it is important to take into account both legal and branding aspects. To ensure that the process of name approval goes smoothly and prevent any future complications, it is essential to follow the legal provisions that are outlined in the Companies Act and its rules. Professional legal advice is advisable for complex situations or names containing government-related terms. This note provides a comprehensive overview of the critical legal provisions that govern company name approval in India. It is important to keep in mind that staying updated on any amendments or clarifications issued by the relevant authorities is crucial.

Conclusion